A response to ‘Editorial - Patient information, risk and choice’, Smith AF, Anaesthesia 2003: 58; 409-11.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Opposing views on orthogonal adaptation: a response to Clifford, Arnold, Smith, and Pianta (2003)
Clifford et al., 2003 point out that there is indeed a subtle difference between their experiment and ours (Westheimer & Gee, 2002). Because it is generally better to provide the observer with an explicit standard when measuring difference thresholds we had interposed a brief presentation of the comparison before showing the test pattern for which the orientation judgment had to be made. Cliffo...
متن کاملResponse to Smith et al
lites after repeated ingestion of sodium metaarsenite by volunteers. Biological monitoring of arsenic exposure of gallium arsenide-and inorganic arsenic-exposed workers by determination of inorganic arsenic and its metabo-lites in urine and hair. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 50:606-612 (1989). micronuclei in exfoliated bladder cells of persons who chronically ingest arsenic-contaminated water in Nevada. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Anaesthesia
سال: 2003
ISSN: 0003-2409
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03463.x